Some of you may have realised that one of my recent short stories was inspired by the exploits of a UK Olympic hopeful canoeist, Kurts Adams Rozentals. But now it seems his sport’s governing body has banned him for two years over a ‘sex act on a plane’.
A disciplinary panel told Kurts after conducting an independent investigation that he had brought the sport into “serious disrepute,” which also amounted to gross misconduct after he posted an explicit video of himself performing a “sexual act” on an aeroplane, which he shared on his Instagram account.
The governing body stated that the canoeist had “admitted posting an explicit video on their public Instagram profile, which was subsequently removed given its explicit nature.” They told Kurtz that his social media post had breached their disciplinary policy, which related to “indecent, offensive or immoral behaviour” and “offensive use of social media.”
I take issue with what they said as their policies effectively gag athletes and prevent them from engaging in lawful activities which the rest of us are free to do, if we wish. The statement also imposes a moral code on athletes which may not align with their morals. What is ethical to one may not be moral to another, but that is not a reason to ban someone because of their morality. After all, for decades, gay people were persecuted because of their different moral code. I should declare that I haven’t seen the video so cannot attest for how explicit it really was, but Kurts explained it did confirm to the PG-13 rules of the site.
I realise that there are always leaks, but Kurts’s explicit content is behind the OnlyFans paywall, and the very explicit content is even charged within that site. (I just had to subscribe for a month to see what all the fuss was about, and what he posts is tame compared to some creators.) What is allowed to be posted on Instagram is tame, and even his Instagram posts are tame compared to some of the bulges I’ve seen on my stream.
Kurts called the suspension “very extreme”, and posting the video didn’t warrant a ban.
Speaking to BBC Sport, he said: “This ban would have never happened if athletes were funded properly. And while I understand the video could be described as crazy, it was not illegal and certainly shouldn’t be the reason for banning an athlete.”
The funding Kurts received from Paddle UK amounted to £16,000 per year, yet he claimed to earn over £100,000 from OnlyFans between January and May.
When interviewed by BBC Sport and asked if he regretted the video, he said: “Looking back now, I probably wouldn’t post something like that.
“But I remember the state of mind I was in when I did film it and post it. It was the first time in my life I saw real progress in my financial situation. It was the first time I was able to fund the training myself.
“It was the first time I was able to get my mum something nice after her sacrificing everything in order to allow me to chase my dream. And it came from crazy videos like the one that got me banned.
“I saw a direct correlation of me making those type of videos and my life situation improving. So, I was in this state of mind where I knew that all I have to do to continue this, is keep making videos like this. It’s a crazy world we live in. I don’t regret it.”
Paddle UK released a statement saying it “committed to ensuring a safe and open environment for all, and action under the athlete disciplinary policy is taken where necessary and proportionate.”
I have seen one of his leaked explicit clips. Not in a plane, but in his car where he wanks and cums. That clip is widely available.
Although I think young people should be able to do with their life what they want to, I can also see the reasoning from Paddle UK. I think their board maybe does not have massive iddues with it, but we all know the British press. I am pretty sure all questions directed to Kurts and his coach would be about his OF page and not about his achievements paddling. I guess they want to aviod that.
Personally I disagree with the actions taken against Kurt Rozentals but the only way to judge their response is how they would or have reacted to similar heterosexual posts. If there is even hint of difference to their response to gay as opposed to straight sexual posts then this must be fought.
Does his OF page show it all? Asking for a friend.
When I subscribed for a month, it was a lot of teasing but no full-frontal. A little like Jack Laugher’s OF page, but more suggestive.
If you wanted to see everything, you had to pay extra for the special videos. Not sure what it is like now. He’s a gorgeous young man and doesn’t deserve a ban for trying to fund his training.
It just goes to show, that in the UK, it’s all about how much money you have and not your talent. Kurts parents aren’t able to fund him, which is why he does OF. If you have well-off parents, you can compete in the Olympics, if you don’t, you will struggle to afford to compete. Such a shame!